Home > Judgment Enforcement > Turnover Proceedings Under CPLR §§ 5225 and 5227

Turnover Proceedings Under CPLR §§ 5225 and 5227

Compelling Banks, Third Parties, and Transferees to Surrender Assets Owed to Judgment Creditors

When a judgment debtor refuses to pay voluntarily, a turnover proceeding is often the most effective path to recovery. These proceedings allow courts to order banks, employers, transferees, and other third parties to turn over money or property belonging to the debtor. In many cases, turnover proceedings reach assets that restraining notices alone cannot access.

New York’s turnover statutes — CPLR §§ 5225(a), 5225(b), and 5227 — are powerful tools. They are also technical, and success requires careful analysis of who holds the assets, what legal interest the debtor has in them, and which procedural route is appropriate.

I take on a limited number of these matters so that each can be pursued with the precision they require.

What a Turnover Proceeding Accomplishes

A turnover proceeding seeks a court order directing a person or entity to deliver money or property to the judgment creditor. Unlike a restraint, which temporarily freezes assets, a turnover order transfers them — often permanently. Turnover proceedings are used when:

• a bank holds funds belonging to the debtor,
• an employer owes wages or commissions,
• a third party is holding property for the debtor,
• another company owes money to the debtor’s business,
• assets were transferred to family members or related entities,
• a debtor is using a corporate form to shield personal assets.

These proceedings bring the court directly into the process, allowing a judge to compel compliance.

Understanding the Three Key Turnover Statutes

CPLR § 5225(a)

Used when the debtor possesses the property. This provision allows the court to order the debtor to surrender assets directly.

CPLR § 5225(b)

Used when a third party holds property in which the debtor has an interest. This is one of the most frequently used turnover statutes in judgment enforcement. It is particularly effective when banks, employers, business partners, or transferees have control over assets.

CPLR § 5227

Used when a third party owes a debt to the judgment debtor. This includes money that will become due in the future, such as receivables, commissions, revenue streams, or obligations arising from contracts.

These statutes are powerful because they allow the court to command the cooperation of third parties who may prefer not to become involved in the debtor’s affairs.

Why Turnover Proceedings Matter

Restraining notices alone often stop short of actual recovery. A bank may freeze an account, but without a turnover order, the funds remain inaccessible. Third parties may ignore information subpoenas or claim confusion about their obligations. Debtors may transfer assets to relatives or operate through multiple companies.

Turnover proceedings provide:

• judicial authority,
• enforceable orders,
• clarity for third parties,
• remedies when assets have been transferred improperly,
• the ability to reach assets that are not in the debtor’s possession,
• an avenue to unwind fraudulent transfers.

In many complex enforcement matters — especially those involving businesses, insiders, or asset concealment — turnover litigation is the centerpiece of recovery.

Common Scenarios Where Turnover Proceedings Are Effective

1. Bank accounts or brokerage accounts. A restraint freezes the funds; a turnover order transfers them to the creditor.
2. Commissions, wages, or payments owed to the debtor. An employer or contracting party can be ordered to pay the creditor instead of the debtor.
3. Receivables owed to the debtor’s business. Companies that owe money to the debtor can be compelled to satisfy the judgment directly.
4. Transfers to family members or insiders. Turnover proceedings can be paired with fraudulent-transfer claims when assets were moved to evade collection.
5. Assets held by related corporate entities. When a debtor uses multiple companies, turnover litigation can reach the entity actually holding the assets.

Turnover law is flexible, and courts interpret these statutes broadly when the evidence shows that the debtor retains a real interest in the asset.

Procedure and Strategy

A successful turnover proceeding requires more than serving papers. It begins with understanding the asset, its legal status, who controls it, and what evidence supports your claim to it. I examine bank records, business documents, contracts, financial statements, and transfers to build a clear picture of the asset trail. Turnover proceedings typically involve:

• filing a petition or initiating a special proceeding,
• presenting evidence of the debtor’s interest in the asset,
• serving all parties who may have a claim to the property,
• obtaining a court order directing turnover or further discovery,
• enforcing compliance if a party refuses to comply voluntarily.

Because these proceedings are litigation, not administrative tools, careful drafting and legal precision are essential.

When Turnover Proceedings Combine With Other Remedies

Turnover proceedings often intersect with:

• fraudulent-transfer actions under the Debtor and Creditor Law,
• restraining notices to freeze assets during litigation,
• information subpoenas to identify missing assets,
• veil-piercing or alter-ego theories,
• claims against transferees who received assets without fair consideration.

These combinations can significantly increase the likelihood of collection, especially when debtors attempt to shield assets.

If You Believe a Third Party Holds Assets Belonging to a Debtor

Turnover proceedings give judgment creditors a direct and powerful route to recovery. If a bank, business partner, employer, or other third party is holding assets connected to a judgment debtor, the law may entitle you to recover those funds. If you hold a judgment and want to understand whether a turnover proceeding is appropriate, you may contact my office for a structured evaluation.

Contact the Office